I think it appropriate to draw attention to this call for evidence that many in civil society, as well as concerned individuals, might want to respond to:
Call for written submissions — Visit by the United Nations Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights to the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from 5 to 16 November 2018
As the call notes:
The United Nations Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights, Professor Philip Alston, will undertake an official visit to the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from 6 to 16 November 2018 at the invitation of the UK Government. His visit will focus, in accordance with his mandate, on the interlinkages between poverty and the realization of human rights in the United Kingdom.
It adds:
The Special Rapporteur is part of a system of so-called UN Special Procedures, made up of independent experts who regularly undertake country visits around the world to report on human rights issues. The Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights has since 2014 (when he was appointed by the Human Rights Council) undertaken country visits to Chile, Romania, Mauritania, China, Saudi Arabia, the United States and Ghana. Every country is different, and each faces its own human rights challenges. The Special Rapporteur thus adapts his approach in accordance with the specific circumstances of the country involved.
The Government's invitation to the Special Rapporteur to visit the United Kingdom reflects its standing invitation to all UN Special Procedures, and its commitment to the principle of accountability, which it encourages other UN Member States to respect also in their countries. An overview of visits by all UN Special Procedures to the United Kingdom and other countries since 1998 can be found here.
Country visits are based on extensive preparations by the Special Rapporteur and his team and are supported by the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights in Geneva. They involve extensive study of topics relevant to the issue of poverty and human rights as well as interviews with civil society organizations, experts and affected individuals before a visit. The actual country visits usually last for about two weeks and include meetings between the Special Rapporteur and government officials, members of the legislature and judiciary, state institutions, civil society organizations, academics, and individuals who have experienced poverty. During his visit the Special Rapporteur will travel to various parts of the UK, but a final decision on his itinerary will not be made until close to the start of the visit.
As a result:
The Special Rapporteur would like to invite all interested individuals and organizations in the United Kingdom working on issues related to poverty and human rights, including representatives of civil society organizations, experts and academics, to provide input for the preparation of his visit to the United Kingdom in November 2018. Submissions can be sent to srextremepoverty@ohchr.org until Friday 14 September at 18:00 GMT. Please note that the Special Rapporteur is also open to receiving input via browser-based encrypted email. Please contact the Special Rapporteur and his team via the email address mentioned above about how to further communicate via encrypted email.
There are more details in the call notice, but what is of special interest are the questions that follow, which indicate areas of concern. I unashamedly share them::
A. GENERAL
(1) What is the definition of poverty and extreme poverty that your organization employs in the context of the United Kingdom and to what extent do official definitions used by the state adequately encompass poverty in all its dimensions?
(2) What is your view on the current official measurement of poverty by the government, what are the shortcomings of the current measurement and what alternatives would be feasible?
(3) What are the most significant human rights violations that people living in poverty and extreme poverty in the United Kingdom experience? Please exemplify by referring to specific cases and relevant norms of international human rights law.
(4) Could you specify how poverty and extreme poverty in the United Kingdom intersect with civil and political rights issues (such as for example the right to political participation or the right to equality before the law)? Please exemplify by referring to specific cases and relevant norms of international human rights law.
(5) Could you specify how poverty and extreme poverty in the United Kingdom intersect with economic and social rights issues (such as the right to education or the right to health care)? Please exemplify by referring to specific cases and relevant norms of international human rights law.
(6) Which areas of the United Kingdom should the Special Rapporteur visit in light of the poverty and human rights situation in those locations?
(7) Which individuals and organizations should the Special Rapporteur meet with during his country visit to the United Kingdom?
B. AUSTERITY
Since 2010, successive governments have engaged in fiscal consolidation, the process of reducing the amount of fiscal deficit of the United Kingdom. This process is popularly referred to as 'austerity' or 'budget cutting'.
(8) To what extent has austerity been necessary given the fiscal outlook of the United Kingdom in the last decade?
(9) Have austerity measures implemented by the government taken adequate account of the impact on vulnerable groups and reflected efforts to minimize negative effects for those groups and individuals?
(10) What have the effects of austerity been on poverty (and inequality) levels in the United Kingdom in the last decade?
(11) Have the human rights of individuals experiencing poverty been affected by austerity measures?
(12) How have local governments been affected by austerity measures in the last decades? If possible, please specify the impact on public services such as police and fire departments, public libraries, and the administration of the welfare system by local authorities.
(13) What alternatives to austerity might have been considered by governments in the last decade? Could any such alternatives have had a more positive impact on poverty (and inequality) levels in the United Kingdom?
(14) What are the potential implications of Brexit on austerity measures in the coming years?
C. UNIVERSAL CREDIT
Universal Credit, which was first announced in 2010, is a key element of welfare reform in the United Kingdom. Its stated aims are to simplify and streamline the benefits system for claimants and administrators, to improve work incentives, to tackle poverty and to reduce fraud and error. The Special Rapporteur is interested in learning more about Universal Credit, including its impact on poverty in the United Kingdom and on the human rights of those living in poverty. Below are some of the questions the Special Rapporteur has in that regard:
(15) To what extent has the Universal Credit been able to achieve the goals identified above?
(16) What has the impact of Universal Credit been on poverty and the lives of the poor in the United Kingdom until now? It would be helpful to also distinguish the specific impact of Universal Credit on specific groups, including for example children, persons with disabilities, women and other groups which may be more vulnerable on the basis of their identity and circumstances.
(17) Claimants apply for Universal Credit online. What has been the impact of Universal Credit being a ‘digital-only benefit' on the ability of potential claimants to apply for this benefit? How does this relate to broadband internet access in the UK and the so-called ‘digital divide'? What is the role of public libraries and Jobcentres in enabling access to broadband internet for those applying for Universal Credit and have these public services been adequate for the purpose?
(18) What has the impact been of various forms of ‘welfare conditionality' in the context of Universal Credit in terms of incentivizing work?
(19) To what extent has the introduction of Universal Credit reduced the incidence of fraud and error in the welfare system?
D. NEW TECHNOLOGIES IN THE WELFARE SYSTEM
The Special Rapporteur is interested in learning more about the impact of new technologies including the use of ‘big data', artificial intelligence, algorithms and automated decision-making processes on the human rights of those living in poverty in the United Kingdom, especially in terms of the functioning of the welfare system. Below are some of the questions the Special Rapporteur has in that regard:
(20) What use does the national government, as well devolved governments and local governments, make of such new technologies in the context of decision-making in the welfare system? A recent report by the House of Commons Science and Technology Committee on ‘Algorithms in decision-making' (May 2018) concluded that the central government does not currently produce, publish or maintain a list of algorithms it uses for public purposes, despite the fact that some of the new technologies that are employed, for example in welfare fraud and error investigations, can may have major negative human rights implications, especially for the poor. The Special Rapporteur is especially interested in learning more about concrete examples of the use of such new technologies by governments in the welfare system.
(21) What is the relevant regulatory framework for the use by government of such new technologies, especially in the context of the welfare system, and are there any shortcomings in the current legal framework?
(22) Which government agencies and departments are responsible for and have oversight over the use of new technologies by governments in the UK, especially in the context of the welfare system? Are their respective responsibilities clearly defined and delineated and are they able to effectively perform their responsibilities?
(23) What are the relevant policies of the central government vis-Ã -vis the use of these new technologies by the government, including especially in the context of the welfare system, and do these policies take into account the potential impact of the use of these technologies on the human rights of those living in poverty?
(24) What are the potential human rights issues faced by individuals living in poverty as a result of the use of new technologies in the UK welfare system?
E. CHILD POVERTY
(25) What is the extent of child poverty in the United Kingdom, and how has it evolved over the last decade?
(26) What are the implications of child poverty for the rights enumerated in the Convention on the Rights of the Child?
(27) What are the main causes of child poverty in the United Kingdom, what have been the main government responses, and how effective have they been?
F. ‘BREXIT'
(28) What are the potential implications of Brexit for the situation of those living in poverty in the United Kingdom?
(29) What are the potential implications of Brexit in terms of protecting the human rights of low-income groups and of persons living in poverty?
(30) To what extent does government planning for Brexit explicitly address the issues arising under questions 28 and 29 above?
Might I encourage people to submit? There is ample expertise amongst commentators on this site to do so. Pick a theme and get going, I suggest.
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
Thank you for this.
I will share this with colleagues at the ALMO and City Council I work for. I think that they should also pass it onto voluntary groups as well. I’ve no idea however if anyone has the time to respond!
Hi Richard,
I would love to read your thoughts on the BBC programme in the link below. In this programme they discuss government debt and I would like to know whether you agree with the views expressed.
Many thanks
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0bf470j
I will try to listen later
I listened. It was a load of rubbish. Posted on the MMT for British LP for comment. Others agreed.
MMT for the British LP FB page.
It took no one a single step forward….
I agree – a disappointing waste of time. Similarly Economics 101, although at least that one spared us the irritating jokey style. Neither seemed to have thought to ask anyone what they might actually want to know and where their stumbling blocks are – they might have started with news and current affairs presenters! All in all a missed opportunity. Still, maybe we should be encouraged that they are at last thinking it would be a useful thing for the BBC to attempt; maybe they will do it better next time, especially if enough people feed back to them
I listened to it. I thought that it was crap. Lies – again…………………………
jan b
“Still, maybe we should be encouraged that they are at last thinking it would be a useful thing for the BBC to attempt; maybe they will do it better next time, especially if enough people feed back to them.”
Agree
@ Richard, Carol et al
Thanks for taking time to listen to the programme and giving some feedback on it.
It seems like the BBC will take some time to get upto speed on economics. This is worrying as this is where at least a reasonable percentage of the population gets its information from.
Maybe feedback to the BBC will help but I am not as literate in economics to make clear enough points
I thought Martin Wolf’s programme was pretty good. I like that it led with the suggestion that the fallacy of composition – one of the most powerful economic concepts -should be taught at school.
That was about all I felt it had going for it
Agree it is nice to think the BBC feels its listenership has achieved enough aural maturity to appreciate analyses of Economics. Unfortunately by serving up half-baked half-truths the BBC is solidifying the fallacy-economics so prevalent in the media. Can only hope future episodes will provide real-life economics impacts.
Thank you very much for this. I have already sent the link to several people whom I know who may be able to contribute.
I’ll give it the best shot I can. Did lee way get given by the UN to the mixing of baselines – e.g. in Section B, they reference 2010 as a baseline year, yet in section E they go for 2008. Then in Section F, they want to talk about 2021 onwards ( as there will be no changes in the UK-EU relationship until the end of 2020 ). I’m tempted to contribute something that compares now with how things were when equal opportunities legislation came in.
It’s about human rights and poverty: so access to legal redress in landlord-tenant disputes and abuses by employers will matter, too.
So will the de facto legal status – effectively, subhuman – of people whose right of residence can be called into doubt by the authorities: they cannot report a crime without the risk of detention and deportation.
Many of these questions need to be answered by the people who actually experience the issues the Rapporteur is looking at. I know the rubric says he and his team will be meeting with those who experience poverty at first hand. I hope that the organisations and charities working in the field will enable and encourage those who are suffering from the policies of this government to make submissions.
It’s worth looking up Article 7 of the Treaty on European Union, which is the suspension of a member state’s rights for (among other things) persistent failures to uphold the human rights of all who reside in their territory.
It’s not an expulsion procedure – surprisingly, the EU doesn’t have one – and I can’t help wondering if this would be, in some way, disappointing or frustrating to the authors of recent policies intended to degrade the protection of human rights in these islands.