Fascinating how an idea can permeate fast.
It is only this year that the Tax Justice Network began to seriously promote my definition of a secrecy jurisdiction as a place that create regulation for the primary benefit and use of those not resident in their geographical domain and that in doing so create a deliberate, legally backed veil of secrecy that ensures that those from outside the jurisdiction making use of its regulation cannot be identified to be doing so.
And then I note from the Jersey Evening Press that:
JERSEY must fight off its image as a tax haven that exists to strip other economies of billions, according to the Attorney General, William Bailhache, and the director general of Jersey Financial Services Commission, John Harris.
It appears to be a reflection of what we are saying.
It's an indication they are worried, as the follwoing also suggest:
Mr Bailhache said that the world situation required Jersey to be more vigilant in meeting the standards which the international community requires to be met. 'At the end of the day, the Island is obviously far too small, politically, geographically and economically, to win any international debate by muscle,' he said. 'The only way of doing so is to show that in those areas which interest the international community - finance and human rights are the most obvious - we not only have the desire to meet international standards but we do actually do so.'
Let's be clear though Mr Bailhache: we do not want the appearance of you doing so: we want the practice that you will do so.
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
This does sound like a shift of mindset, Richard:
“Mr Bailhache said […] ‘The only way of doing so is to show that in those areas which interest the international community – finance and human rights are the most obvious – we not only have the desire to meet international standards but we do actually do so.’ ”
That surely implies a recognition – which I don’t think we’ve heard as clearly before – that the island may not be ‘actually’ meeting the international standards (e.g. on information exchange).
It would be great to see Jersey take a lead on this, bringing less enlightened secrecy jurisdictions along in its wake.
Alex
I suspect they won’t agree with you on information exchange – where I suspect they are doing all that is expected of them – but it would be great if you’re right
Richard