Simon Jenkins wrote this in the Guardian today. His logic is sound. I've added paragraph breaks:
For half a century home ownership in Britain - termed a "right" by Brown - has been indulged beyond economic reason.
It has sucked savings out of the productive sector.
It has tied up pension money that should be helping the economy in the stock market.
Its tax reliefs have immobilised young people who, in most countries, remain in the more fluid rented sector until later in life.
It has led to mass hysteria with every price rise or fall.
Housing sees the British, their rulers and their newspapers, at their most innumerate and irrational.
This is why, for example, the argument that Inheritance Tax thresholds should increase because the owner of a 'normal house' might pay that tax is irrational. But politicians simply bow to the pressure.
And the young people in our country pay the price.
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
The blindness re housing is because this is a land issue, nothing to do with bricks and mortar. Neoclassical economists have removed the concept of land and natural resources from their analytical toolkit. If they talk about land at all it is only with regard to agriculture.
Land(location) is in fixed supply and speculators perceive that the price will always go up (given the long 18 year cycle). At the right time in the cycle speculators make a killing, but those in it for the long term (e.g. the British aristocracy) can afford to sit on their huge landholdings and see their wealth grow over the decades.
The solution is, of course, a 100% tax on rental value of all land, equivalent to land nationalisation. At the moment all the increase in land value goes to the speculator, the elderly home owner and the banks. It could be, should be, recycled through the tax system to benefit us all, reducing the burden on the creators of wealth.
Ah, but Richard, Simon is wrong there is a numberate and rational attitude – that of the capitalist class.
Home ownership – or rather the process of buying a house which involves getting into debt and then paying it off, plus interest – ties workers hands with regard to prolonged industrial action, encourages them to view themselves as owning property (though of course, it is not the same kind or on the same scale as that owned by capitalists).
The problem is: how to keep it going. Right now, King’s trying to restart the banking system and Brown is trying to keep the “fourth option” off the agenda.