Accountancy Age has covered a story first reported by the FT and says:
The private equity industry is facing a tough shake-up in the way it is taxed, with chancellor Alistair Darling proposing stiffer capital gains tax (CGT) rates and lengthening the taper relief period.
According to the FT, Darling is considering an increase in CGT from 10% to 20% for businesses classed as business assets as well as an increase in the taper relief period from two years to five years.
I'm all in favour of the 20% rate. There never was a reason for the 10% rate, which was far too low.
I'm also quite happy that:
Also under consideration is the idea of drawing a tax distinction between mega-fund buyouts and small venture capital deals.
I've made clear, I agree with this. These are two quite separate activities which have fundamentally different risk profiles and roles to play in the economy.
But you can bet your bottom dollar that this is right:
The reforms were reportedly discussed in meetings last week between Treasury officials and private equity representatives. Buy-out bosses are said to be relieved by the proposals, as they feared much harsher measures.
They must be laughing themselves silly. The simple fact is that only private equity employees pay capital gains tax on their earnings from employment. Everyone else pays income tax. And all Alastair Darling is proposing to do is double their capital gains tax rate to a level which will still be half of that which is due under income tax rules.
This is madness. Not least because as the Observer has (I think reliably) pointed out, at least 80% of those involved are non-domiciled and as such can record their capital gains outside the UK, and so tax free.
For heaven's sake, it's time for the government to smell the mood of the nation and stop tax abuse of this sort. Let's have a level playing field, now.
Thanks for reading this post.
You can share this post on social media of your choice by clicking these icons:
You can subscribe to this blog's daily email here.
And if you would like to support this blog you can, here:
Richard, in your immediate response to the PBR you state your belief that entrepreneurs who build-up small companies from scratch will be penalised by a CGT rate of 18%. But here you’re all in favour of a 20% rate. Did you mean to make the distinction between business assets of the entrepreneur owned variety as opposed to private equity managed ones?
I persist in the belief that 20% is fair.
What I do not think is that small business and those who have created real value should pay at the same rate as those who trade in shares or but to let properties.
Richard